国内有这个速度都不错了。
实名羡慕
这个工具不错
从来不会做错题的我怎么可能用得到这个机器
多年前为了离线写作，用过一阵 Windows Live Writer（微软开发的）
听说过这个玩意儿，很厉害
服务器做处理，机智。边缘计算。
超纲了，没这么玩过
天气调试好了。https://openweathermap.org/ 提供的 API。
这个动态图形效果很赞
@FANG Python 多线程也是鸡肋般的存在
小组相关帖子：
https://talk.quwj.com/topic/2008
https://talk.quwj.com/topic/2021
https://talk.quwj.com/topic/2017
@RaspiSQH 没有实体店，电子荒漠
外壳打样出来了。才发现 OLED 屏幕尺寸是 1.3 寸的，买小了。还是太年轻啊。
又重新订购屏幕，要是在广东就好了，搞硬件研发周期可以成倍缩小。
可以用来做点啥好
微信群里做成的那位不是你么
晚上推到重来，做了一个新的设计。
让一个底板同时兼容ESP8266和ESP32模块。
很可能要延至年后打样了，争取年前吧。
长得像顶级域名的二级域名
夜深了，年轻人不要老熬夜
换成 DHT22 对比了一下 DHT11，温度基本上一致。湿度数值与 DHT11 相差 3%。
DHT11 vs DHT22
We have two versions of DHT sensor, they look a bit similar and have the same pinout, but have different characteristics. Here are the specs:
DHT11
Good for 20-80% humidity readings with 5% accuracy Good for 0-50°C temperature readings ±2°C accuracy No more than 1 Hz sampling rate (once every second)
Ultra low cost
3 to 5V power and I/O
2.5mA max current use during conversion (while requesting data)
Body size 15.5mm x 12mm x 5.5mm
4 pins with 0.1" spacing
DHT22
Good for 0-100% humidity readings with 2-5% accuracy Good for -40 to 125°C temperature readings ±0.5°C accuracy No more than 0.5 Hz sampling rate (once every 2 seconds)
Low cost
3 to 5V power and I/O
2.5mA max current use during conversion (while requesting data)
Body size 15.1mm x 25mm x 7.7mm
4 pins with 0.1" spacing
As you can see, the DHT22 is a little more accurate and good over a slightly larger range. Both use a single digital pin and are 'sluggish' in that you can't query them more than once every second (DHT11) or two (DHT22).
